Yashpal S/o Prem Singh vs Saleem s/o Shahnajar — 64/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Takmil ,mahayda. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 11th March 2026.

Civil Suit

CNR: UPSM110000922021

Case disposed

Filing Number

90/2021

Filing Date

11-08-2021

Registration No

64/2021

Registration Date

11-08-2021

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Kairana

Judge

1-civil judge senior division, kairana

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Takmil ,mahayda

Petitioner(s)

Yashpal S/o Prem Singh

Adv. Intazar Ahmad

Respondent(s)

Saleem s/o Shahnajar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-civil judge senior division, kairana

11-03-2026

Disposed

27-02-2026

Judgement

18-02-2026

WS/ISSUES

06-02-2026

WS/ISSUES

16-01-2026

WS/ISSUES

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Judgment

Summary The court decided in favor of the plaintiff (Yashpal) against the defendant (Saleem) in a civil suit regarding specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land. The court held that the plaintiff is entitled to obtain the transfer of the land as per the memorandum of understanding (Ikrarnamah) dated 14.08.2019, and directed the defendant to execute the sale deed within two months after receiving the remaining payment from the plaintiff. The plaintiff was consistently ready to complete the transaction while the defendant repeatedly defaulted despite multiple notices and opportunities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court decided in favor of the plaintiff (Yashpal) against the defendant (Saleem) in a civil suit regarding specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land. The court held that the plaintiff is entitled to obtain the transfer of the land as per the memorandum of understanding (Ikrarnamah) dated 14.08.2019, and directed the defendant to execute the sale deed within two months after receiving the remaining payment from the plaintiff. The plaintiff was consistently ready to complete the transaction while the defendant repeatedly defaulted despite multiple notices and opportunities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Kairana All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case