VEDRAM SO RANGI LAL vs State of U.P. — 27/2026
Case under --- Section 109,1,118,1,191,2,351,3,352,115,2. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSL070008892026
Filing Number
889/2026
Filing Date
05-02-2026
Registration No
27/2026
Registration Date
05-02-2026
Court
Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Chandausi
Judge
1-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Outlying Court Chandausi
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VEDRAM SO RANGI LAL
Adv. VINOD KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
State of U.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Outlying Court Chandausi
Disposed
For Bail
For Bail
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | For Bail |
| 27-02-2026 | For Bail |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge in Chandausi, Sambhal, granted bail to the accused Vedram in a case involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 118(1), 191(2), 351(3), 352, and 115(2). The court found that the allegations against the accused were based on false and baseless facts, noting inconsistencies in the FIR and lack of concrete evidence of his direct participation in the alleged assault. The bail was granted on the condition of a personal bond of ₹50,000 with a surety of equal amount, with instructions that the accused cooperate fully with the investigation and not tamper with evidence or commit further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge in Chandausi, Sambhal, granted bail to the accused Vedram in a case involving charges under IPC sections 109(1), 118(1), 191(2), 351(3), 352, and 115(2). The court found that the allegations against the accused were based on false and baseless facts, noting inconsistencies in the FIR and lack of concrete evidence of his direct participation in the alleged assault. The bail was granted on the condition of a personal bond of ₹50,000 with a surety of equal amount, with instructions that the accused cooperate fully with the investigation and not tamper with evidence or commit further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts