Firoj vs Dara alias Sagir and other — 244/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22-38. Status: For filing Written Statement. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: UPSI120009942024
Next Hearing
13th May 2026
Filing Number
300/2024
Filing Date
29-07-2024
Registration No
244/2024
Registration Date
29-07-2024
Court
Outlying Court Biswan
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Div.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Firoj
Adv. S.K. Shrivastva Adv.
Respondent(s)
Dara alias Sagir and other
Altmash
Ashiya
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Div.
For filing Written Statement
For filing Written Statement
For filing Written Statement
For filing Written Statement
For filing Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | For filing Written Statement |
| 05-03-2026 | For filing Written Statement |
| 24-12-2025 | For filing Written Statement |
| 28-11-2025 | For filing Written Statement |
| 13-10-2025 | For filing Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Civil Suit No. 244/2024 (Firoz v. Dara alias Sher) before the Civil Judge at Biswan, Sitapur, the court rejected the plaintiff's petition 6/2 for interim injunction without hearing the defendants, finding insufficient evidence to support the claims of unlawful possession and property damage. The court directed notice to defendants and adjourned the matter to 23.08.2024 for further disposition. Additionally, the court accepted petition 8/2 and appointed an advocate commissioner to conduct an on-site inspection and submit a report with both parties present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Civil Suit No. 244/2024 (Firoz v. Dara alias Sher) before the Civil Judge at Biswan, Sitapur, the court rejected the plaintiff's petition 6/2 for interim injunction without hearing the defendants, finding insufficient evidence to support the claims of unlawful possession and property damage. The court directed notice to defendants and adjourned the matter to 23.08.2024 for further disposition. Additionally, the court accepted petition 8/2 and appointed an advocate commissioner to conduct an on-site inspection and submit a report with both parties present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts