Anil Kumar vs Kaushal Kishor and others — 148/2004
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Na. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED EX PARTE on 16th April 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: UPSI120001872004
Filing Number
148/2004
Filing Date
15-Jul-2004
Registration No
148/2004
Registration Date
15-Jul-2004
Court
Outlying Court Biswan
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Div.
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED EX PARTE
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anil Kumar
Adv. na
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kaushal Kishor and others
-
2.Reshma Devi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Summary: Civil Suit 148/2004 — Anil Kumar v. Kaushal Kishor and Others The court dismissed Anil Kumar's suit against Kaushal Kishor and Reshma Devi regarding disputed agricultural land (plots 180/0.275, 193/0.186, and 194/0.185). The plaintiff claimed the defendants fraudulently obtained a sale deed dated 11.06.2004 through illegal collusion with revenue officials, harming his rights as a minor to inherited ancestral property. The court found the plaintiff failed to substantiate his allegations through credible documentary or recorded evidence and did not present satisfactory proof of ownership or possession to overcome the defendants' burden. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
03-Apr-2026
For final arguments
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
12-Mar-2026
For final arguments
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
16-Feb-2026
For final arguments
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
09-Feb-2026
For final arguments
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
06-Feb-2026
For examination of witnesses
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
03-Feb-2026
For examination of witnesses
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
02-Feb-2026
For examination of witnesses
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
27-Jan-2026
For examination of witnesses
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
21-Jan-2026
For examination of witnesses
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
13-Jan-2026
For examination of witnesses
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
20-Dec-2025
For examination of witnesses
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
02-Dec-2025
For examination of witnesses
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
04-Nov-2025
For examination of witnesses
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
30-Sep-2025
For examination of witnesses
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
27-Aug-2025
For examination of witnesses
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
18-Aug-2025
For examination of witnesses
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
04-Aug-2025
For examination of witnesses
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
09-Jul-2025
For examination of witnesses
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
22-May-2025
For examination of witnesses
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
15-Apr-2025
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
04-Mar-2025
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
24-Jan-2025
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
17-Dec-2024
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
11-Dec-2024
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
05-Dec-2024
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
07-Nov-2024
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
01-Oct-2024
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
22-Aug-2024
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
31-Jul-2024
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
08-Jul-2024
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
02-Jul-2024
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
27-May-2024
Restored
Civil Judge Jr. Div.
-
24-Jul-2013
Disposed
-
03-May-2013
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jul-2004
Case filed
Registration No. 148/2004
Summary: Civil Suit 148/2004 — Anil Kumar v. Kaushal Kishor and Others The court dismissed Anil Kumar's suit against Kaushal Kishor and Reshma Devi regarding disputed agricultural land (plots 180/0.275, 193/0.186, and 194/0.185). The plaintiff claimed the defendants fraudulently obtained a sale deed dated 11.06.2004 through illegal collusion with revenue officials, harming his rights as a minor to inherited ancestral property. The court found the plaintiff failed to substantiate his allegations through credible documentary or recorded evidence and did not present satisfactory proof of ownership or possession to overcome the defendants' burden. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts