Parasnath vs Aarti Devi — 228/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--Decided on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Revision

CNR: UPSI010081242025

Filing Number

7543/2025

Filing Date

26-Nov-2025

Registration No

228/2025

Registration Date

26-Nov-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decided

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

MAHMUDABAD

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Parasnath

    Adv. Ram Teerath Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Aarti Devi

  2. 2.Neetu Soni

  3. 3.Reshma Devi Lekhpal

  4. 4.Pyare Lal Munshi

  5. 5.Ashok Kumar

  6. 6.Harsh Gupta

  7. 7.Vijay Singh

  8. 8.Piyush Porwal

  9. 9.Shashikant Chauhan

  10. 10.Updesh Chauhan

  11. 11.Shiv Dayal

  12. 12.Uttar Pradesh Sarkar

    Adv. DGC Criminal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Revision 228/2025 - Parasnath v. Aarti Devi Court Decision: The Session Court rejected a criminal revision petition filed by Parasnath challenging an order from the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate dismissing his petition under Section 173(4) CrPC (for cognizance of a criminal case). The court found the lower court's order legally sound and based on proper examination of evidence presented, confirming the dismissal was valid. Key Reasoning: The revision court determined that a civil land dispute (involving ancestral property inheritance) between the petitioner and respondents was pending before the Revenue Court, making the matter civil rather than criminal in nature. Since the underlying matter was civil, the lower court properly exercised discretion in declining criminal cognizance under Section 173(4) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    Hearing Applications

    District Judge

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Hearing Applications

    District Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing Applications

    District Judge

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing Applications

    District Judge

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Hearing Applications

    District Judge

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Hearing Applications

    District Judge

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    Hearing Applications

    District Judge

  11. 26-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 26-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 228/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Revision 228/2025 - Parasnath v. Aarti Devi Court Decision: The Session Court rejected a criminal revision petition filed by Parasnath challenging an order from the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate dismissing his petition under Section 173(4) CrPC (for cognizance of a criminal case). The court found the lower court's order legally sound and based on proper examination of evidence presented, confirming the dismissal was valid. Key Reasoning: The revision court determined that a civil land dispute (involving ancestral property inheritance) between the petitioner and respondents was pending before the Revenue Court, making the matter civil rather than criminal in nature. Since the underlying matter was civil, the lower court properly exercised discretion in declining criminal cognizance under Section 173(4) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case