Priti Mohan Kaur vs Rajbeer Singh — 189/2025
Case under Mental Health Act Section 50. Disposed: Contested--Decided on 15th May 2026.
Misc. Civil Cases
CNR: UPSI010060012025
Filing Number
451/2025
Filing Date
09-09-2025
Registration No
189/2025
Registration Date
09-09-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
15th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decided
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Priti Mohan Kaur
Adv. Shiv Gopal Dixit
Respondent(s)
Rajbeer Singh
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-05-2026 | Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail |
| 30-04-2026 | Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail |
| 20-04-2026 | Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail |
| 25-03-2026 | Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 189/2025 Summary The court appointed Priti Mohan Kaur as guardian of her son Harpreet Singh, who has been 90% mentally disabled since infancy due to brain fever. The court found Priti Mohan Kaur (the petitioner/mother) suitable as guardian under Section 50 of the Mental Health Act 1987, with the respondent brother Rajbeer Singh consenting. The guardian must ensure proper nutrition, medical care, and housing while prohibiting sale of the mentally disabled person's property share without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 189/2025 Summary The court appointed Priti Mohan Kaur as guardian of her son Harpreet Singh, who has been 90% mentally disabled since infancy due to brain fever. The court found Priti Mohan Kaur (the petitioner/mother) suitable as guardian under Section 50 of the Mental Health Act 1987, with the respondent brother Rajbeer Singh consenting. The guardian must ensure proper nutrition, medical care, and housing while prohibiting sale of the mentally disabled person's property share without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts