Vishal Awasthi vs Uttar Pradesh Sarkar Advocate - DGC Criminal — 763/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 351(2). Disposed: Contested--BAIL CANCELLED on 28th April 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSI010017542026
Filing Number
1650/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
763/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL CANCELLED
FIR Details
FIR Number
71
Police Station
RAMKOT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vishal Awasthi
Adv. Deepak Kumar Rathaur
Respondent(s)
Uttar Pradesh Sarkar Advocate - DGC Criminal
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Hearing Applications
Hearing Applications
Hearing Applications
Hearing Applications
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | Hearing Applications |
| 16-04-2026 | Hearing Applications |
| 09-04-2026 | Hearing Applications |
| 04-04-2026 | Hearing Applications |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 763/2026 Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Sitapur rejected Vishal Awasthi's bail petition in a case involving charges under BNS Section 351(2) and Information Technology Act Section 67 (2008). The court found that the accused had allegedly created non-consensual intimate videos of a minor girl (born 05.07.2008) without her consent, shared them on social media, and made threatening statements. The court determined the crime was serious in nature and that insufficient grounds existed to grant bail, considering the severity of offenses against a child and the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 763/2026 Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Sitapur rejected Vishal Awasthi's bail petition in a case involving charges under BNS Section 351(2) and Information Technology Act Section 67 (2008). The court found that the accused had allegedly created non-consensual intimate videos of a minor girl (born 05.07.2008) without her consent, shared them on social media, and made threatening statements. The court determined the crime was serious in nature and that insufficient grounds existed to grant bail, considering the severity of offenses against a child and the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts