Rohit alias Kaliya vs Uttar Pradesh Sarkar — 723/2026

Case under U P Gangster Act Section 2/3. Disposed: Contested--BAIL CANCELLED on 28th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPSI010016892026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1587/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

723/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

28th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL CANCELLED

FIR Details

FIR Number

42

Police Station

PISAWAN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

U P Gangster Act Section 2/3

Petitioner(s)

Rohit alias Kaliya

Adv. Rakesh Kumar Choursia

Respondent(s)

Uttar Pradesh Sarkar

Hearing History

Judge: 4-3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge

28-03-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

23-03-2026

Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

18-03-2026

Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

16-03-2026

Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

Final Orders / Judgements

28-03-2026
Copy of bail order

Case Summary: 723/2026 Rohit alias Kaliya v. Uttar Pradesh Sarkar The court rejected the bail petition of Rohit alias Kaliya, an alleged gang leader, filed under the U.P. Gangsters Act. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated and sought release on bail, but the Special Judge found that six criminal cases were registered against him, including theft and robbery committed with gang members for economic gain. The court determined there was no reasonable basis to trust that granting bail would prevent further criminal activity, particularly given the gang chart evidence and the petitioner's consistent pattern of criminal conduct. The bail petition was accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 723/2026 Rohit alias Kaliya v. Uttar Pradesh Sarkar The court rejected the bail petition of Rohit alias Kaliya, an alleged gang leader, filed under the U.P. Gangsters Act. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated and sought release on bail, but the Special Judge found that six criminal cases were registered against him, including theft and robbery committed with gang members for economic gain. The court determined there was no reasonable basis to trust that granting bail would prevent further criminal activity, particularly given the gang chart evidence and the petitioner's consistent pattern of criminal conduct. The bail petition was accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case