Uttar Pradesh Sarkar vs Pramod Kumar verma and others — 3800227/2013
Case under Uttar Pradesh Control of Gunda Activity Section 2,3. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th March 2026.
old Gangster Act
CNR: UPSI010015692010
Filing Number
3800227/2013
Filing Date
28-08-2010
Registration No
3800227/2013
Registration Date
03-08-2013
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
185
Police Station
MAHMUDABAD
Year
2009
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Uttar Pradesh Sarkar
Respondent(s)
Pramod Kumar verma and others
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
For final arguments
For final arguments
For final arguments
For final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | For final arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | For final arguments |
| 24-02-2026 | For final arguments |
| 19-02-2026 | For final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 3800227/2013 Court Decision: The Special Judge acquitted all three accused—Pramod Kumar Verma, Chhotakne, and Raju—of charges under Sections 2/3 of the UP Gangster Act, 1986. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused formed an organized gang engaged in criminal activities for financial or material gain. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical procedural failures in the gang chart preparation, which lacked proper deliberation between district authorities as required by law. Additionally, prosecution witnesses provided only hearsay evidence and failed to establish concrete proof of organized criminal conduct, financial gains from crimes, or terror in the community. The court emphasized that anti-gang legislation requires strict adherence to legal procedures and solid evidentiary foundations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 3800227/2013 Court Decision: The Special Judge acquitted all three accused—Pramod Kumar Verma, Chhotakne, and Raju—of charges under Sections 2/3 of the UP Gangster Act, 1986. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused formed an organized gang engaged in criminal activities for financial or material gain. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical procedural failures in the gang chart preparation, which lacked proper deliberation between district authorities as required by law. Additionally, prosecution witnesses provided only hearsay evidence and failed to establish concrete proof of organized criminal conduct, financial gains from crimes, or terror in the community. The court emphasized that anti-gang legislation requires strict adherence to legal procedures and solid evidentiary foundations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts