Pintu vs Uttar Pradesh Sarkar — 648/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,80(2),352. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPSI010014042026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1318/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

648/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

40

Police Station

MAHOLI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,80(2),352
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

Pintu

Adv. Prem Ratan Katiyar

Respondent(s)

Uttar Pradesh Sarkar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge

18-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Hearing Applications

12-03-2026

Hearing Applications

11-03-2026

Hearing Applications

06-03-2026

Hearing Applications

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Copy of bail order

Summary: Case 648/2026 – Pintu vs. Uttar Pradesh Sarkar The court rejected Pintu's bail application in a dowry death case. Pintu was accused of demanding additional dowry from his wife Shanti Devi after their marriage on 18.04.2024, and allegedly torturing and killing her on 01-02-2025 by strangulation when the dowry demand was not fulfilled. The court found the charges under IPC Sections 85, 80(2), 352 and DPTA Section 3/4 serious, with autopsy confirming death by ante-mortem hanging/asphyxiation, and determined insufficient grounds for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 648/2026 – Pintu vs. Uttar Pradesh Sarkar The court rejected Pintu's bail application in a dowry death case. Pintu was accused of demanding additional dowry from his wife Shanti Devi after their marriage on 18.04.2024, and allegedly torturing and killing her on 01-02-2025 by strangulation when the dowry demand was not fulfilled. The court found the charges under IPC Sections 85, 80(2), 352 and DPTA Section 3/4 serious, with autopsy confirming death by ante-mortem hanging/asphyxiation, and determined insufficient grounds for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case