Pintu vs Uttar Pradesh Sarkar — 648/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,80(2),352. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSI010014042026
Filing Number
1318/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
648/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
40
Police Station
MAHOLI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pintu
Adv. Prem Ratan Katiyar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Uttar Pradesh Sarkar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of bail orderView PDF
Summary: Case 648/2026 – Pintu vs. Uttar Pradesh Sarkar The court rejected Pintu's bail application in a dowry death case. Pintu was accused of demanding additional dowry from his wife Shanti Devi after their marriage on 18.04.2024, and allegedly torturing and killing her on 01-02-2025 by strangulation when the dowry demand was not fulfilled. The court found the charges under IPC Sections 85, 80(2), 352 and DPTA Section 3/4 serious, with autopsy confirming death by ante-mortem hanging/asphyxiation, and determined insufficient grounds for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing Applications
District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing Applications
District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing Applications
District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing Applications
District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 648/2026
Summary: Case 648/2026 – Pintu vs. Uttar Pradesh Sarkar The court rejected Pintu's bail application in a dowry death case. Pintu was accused of demanding additional dowry from his wife Shanti Devi after their marriage on 18.04.2024, and allegedly torturing and killing her on 01-02-2025 by strangulation when the dowry demand was not fulfilled. The court found the charges under IPC Sections 85, 80(2), 352 and DPTA Section 3/4 serious, with autopsy confirming death by ante-mortem hanging/asphyxiation, and determined insufficient grounds for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts