Rahmatun vs Uttar Pradesh Sarkar — 628/2026
Case under U P Gangster Act Section 2/3. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSI010013732026
Filing Number
1289/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
628/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
122
Police Station
MANPUR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rahmatun
Adv. Murli Dhar Sharma
Respondent(s)
Uttar Pradesh Sarkar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail |
| 27-02-2026 | Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail |
| 23-02-2026 | Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 628/2026 Summary Rahmatun v. Uttar Pradesh Sarkar — The court rejected Rahmatun's bail petition under the U.P. Gangsters Act, Sections 2/3. Rahmatun, accused of being a gang member involved in her husband's murder alongside other co-accused, sought bail claiming false charges. The court found credible evidence of her gang membership and involvement in serious offenses under Chapter 16 of IPC, determining insufficient grounds to believe she would abstain from criminal activity if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 628/2026 Summary Rahmatun v. Uttar Pradesh Sarkar — The court rejected Rahmatun's bail petition under the U.P. Gangsters Act, Sections 2/3. Rahmatun, accused of being a gang member involved in her husband's murder alongside other co-accused, sought bail claiming false charges. The court found credible evidence of her gang membership and involvement in serious offenses under Chapter 16 of IPC, determining insufficient grounds to believe she would abstain from criminal activity if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts