Rahmatun vs Uttar Pradesh Sarkar — 628/2026

Case under U P Gangster Act Section 2/3. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSI010013732026

Filing Number

1289/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

628/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

122

Police Station

MANPUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

U P Gangster Act Section 2/3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rahmatun

    Adv. Murli Dhar Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Uttar Pradesh Sarkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of bail orderView PDF

    Case 628/2026 Summary Rahmatun v. Uttar Pradesh Sarkar — The court rejected Rahmatun's bail petition under the U.P. Gangsters Act, Sections 2/3. Rahmatun, accused of being a gang member involved in her husband's murder alongside other co-accused, sought bail claiming false charges. The court found credible evidence of her gang membership and involvement in serious offenses under Chapter 16 of IPC, determining insufficient grounds to believe she would abstain from criminal activity if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

    3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

    3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 628/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 628/2026 Summary Rahmatun v. Uttar Pradesh Sarkar — The court rejected Rahmatun's bail petition under the U.P. Gangsters Act, Sections 2/3. Rahmatun, accused of being a gang member involved in her husband's murder alongside other co-accused, sought bail claiming false charges. The court found credible evidence of her gang membership and involvement in serious offenses under Chapter 16 of IPC, determining insufficient grounds to believe she would abstain from criminal activity if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case