Uttar Pradesh Sarkar vs Kamlesh And Others — 3800285/2013
Case under Uttar Pradesh Control of Gunda Activity Section 2,3. Disposed: Contested--Decided on 06th May 2026.
old Gangster Act
CNR: UPSI010002152003
Filing Number
3800285/2013
Filing Date
07-03-2003
Registration No
3800285/2013
Registration Date
07-08-2013
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
6-5th Additional District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decided
FIR Details
FIR Number
98
Police Station
MANPUR
Year
2002
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Uttar Pradesh Sarkar
Respondent(s)
Kamlesh And Others
Hearing History
Judge: 6-5th Additional District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
For Judgement
For Judgement
For final arguments
For final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-05-2026 | For Judgement |
| 01-05-2026 | For Judgement |
| 28-04-2026 | For final arguments |
| 16-04-2026 | For final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Uttar Pradesh Sarkar v. Kamlesh and Others (CIS: 3800285/2013) The Special Judge (Gangster Act) acquitted accused Kamlesh of charges under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangster Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he was part of an organized gang engaged in criminal activities for financial gain. Though the prosecution presented five witnesses and documentary evidence including a gang chart, the court noted that the cases cited in the gang chart resulted in acquittals, no evidence proved criminal conspiracy or economic benefit from alleged offenses, and contradictions existed in witness testimonies. Two co-accused died during trial proceedings. The court held that doubt favors the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Uttar Pradesh Sarkar v. Kamlesh and Others (CIS: 3800285/2013) The Special Judge (Gangster Act) acquitted accused Kamlesh of charges under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangster Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he was part of an organized gang engaged in criminal activities for financial gain. Though the prosecution presented five witnesses and documentary evidence including a gang chart, the court noted that the cases cited in the gang chart resulted in acquittals, no evidence proved criminal conspiracy or economic benefit from alleged offenses, and contradictions existed in witness testimonies. Two co-accused died during trial proceedings. The court held that doubt favors the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts