Valeema alias Valeena vs Uttar Pradesh Sarkar Advocate - DGC Criminal — 75/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),304(B). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSI010001782026

Filing Number

164/2026

Filing Date

07-Jan-2026

Registration No

75/2026

Registration Date

07-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-1st Additional District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

110

Police Station

TAMBAUR

Year

2003

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),304(B)
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Valeema alias Valeena

    Adv. Mohd. Yusuf

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Uttar Pradesh Sarkar Advocate - DGC Criminal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of bail orderView PDF

    Case Summary: 75/2026 The court rejected the petitioner Valeema's (alias Valeena) bail application in a dowry death case (Sections 498A and 304B IPC, PS Tambour, Sitapur). The petitioner's daughter Aafsha was allegedly tortured by her husband Fakir Ali and in-laws for insufficient dowry; she died under suspicious circumstances within seven years of marriage. The prosecution alleged the petitioner's family caused her death, while the defense claimed she was separately residing while pregnant and suffered injuries leading to death. The court found the case to be of grave nature involving dowry-related homicide and found no sufficient grounds to grant bail, rejecting all mitigating arguments about the petitioner's health and treatment requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge

  10. 20-Feb-2026

    Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge

  11. 18-Feb-2026

    Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge

  12. 17-Feb-2026

    Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge

  13. 11-Feb-2026

    Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge

  14. 09-Feb-2026

    Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge

  15. 04-Feb-2026

    Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge

  16. 28-Jan-2026

    Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge

  17. 22-Jan-2026

    Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge

  18. 16-Jan-2026

    Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge

  19. 12-Jan-2026

    Interim Hearing/Hearing Applications/Bail

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge

  20. 07-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 07-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 75/2026 The court rejected the petitioner Valeema's (alias Valeena) bail application in a dowry death case (Sections 498A and 304B IPC, PS Tambour, Sitapur). The petitioner's daughter Aafsha was allegedly tortured by her husband Fakir Ali and in-laws for insufficient dowry; she died under suspicious circumstances within seven years of marriage. The prosecution alleged the petitioner's family caused her death, while the defense claimed she was separately residing while pregnant and suffered injuries leading to death. The court found the case to be of grave nature involving dowry-related homicide and found no sufficient grounds to grant bail, rejecting all mitigating arguments about the petitioner's health and treatment requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case