State Government vs Puttulal alias Narendra Gupta Advocate - Shri Ram Kishor — 460/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3),340(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 17th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSH010009382026
Filing Number
864/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
460/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-Additional District and Sessions Judge,Court No.7
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 23-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Adv. DGC
Respondent(s)
-
1.Puttulal alias Narendra Gupta Advocate - Shri Ram Kishor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The court rejected the interim bail application of Puttu Lal Gupta, accused in a cybercrime case (FIR No. 604/2025) involving online stock market fraud. The court found substantial evidence linking the accused to a scheme where victims were deceived into investing in a fake "Global Trade" company, with funds diverted to personal bank accounts; the court noted the serious nature of the offense and the credible documentary evidence against the accused. The court ordered the accused to remain in judicial custody, citing the gravity of cybercrime offenses and the need to protect public interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District and Sessions Judge,Court No.7
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing/Interim Hearing applications/bail
Additional District and Sessions Judge,Court No.7
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing/Interim Hearing applications/bail
Additional District and Sessions Judge,Court No.7
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing/Interim Hearing applications/bail
Additional District and Sessions Judge,Court No.7
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 460/2026
The court rejected the interim bail application of Puttu Lal Gupta, accused in a cybercrime case (FIR No. 604/2025) involving online stock market fraud. The court found substantial evidence linking the accused to a scheme where victims were deceived into investing in a fake "Global Trade" company, with funds diverted to personal bank accounts; the court noted the serious nature of the offense and the credible documentary evidence against the accused. The court ordered the accused to remain in judicial custody, citing the gravity of cybercrime offenses and the need to protect public interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts