State Government vs Jahangir Hasan Khan urf Bobi — 451/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSH010009062026
Filing Number
834/2026
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
451/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.2
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 22-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
73
Police Station
SADAR BAZAR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Adv. ADGC
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jahangir Hasan Khan urf Bobi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary The Special Court for SC/ST (Atrocities Prevention) Act in Shahjahanpur granted bail to both accused Jahangir Hasan Khan and Alamgir Hasan Khan on March 18, 2026, in FIR No. 73/2025 under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and SC/ST Act provisions. The court found insufficient evidence of criminal history or likelihood of witness tampering, and accepted their bail application with conditions including a personal bond of ₹25,000 each and a surety of the same amount, along with undertakings to appear regularly before the court and not commit further offenses related to the case allegations of abusive language, caste-based slurs, and physical assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.2
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing/Interim Hearing applications/bail
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.2
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 451/2026
Case Summary The Special Court for SC/ST (Atrocities Prevention) Act in Shahjahanpur granted bail to both accused Jahangir Hasan Khan and Alamgir Hasan Khan on March 18, 2026, in FIR No. 73/2025 under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and SC/ST Act provisions. The court found insufficient evidence of criminal history or likelihood of witness tampering, and accepted their bail application with conditions including a personal bond of ₹25,000 each and a surety of the same amount, along with undertakings to appear regularly before the court and not commit further offenses related to the case allegations of abusive language, caste-based slurs, and physical assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts