Dharmendra Nath Tripathi vs Ram Sagar — 14/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Uncontested--Rejected on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

Misc. Civil Cases

CNR: UPSH010008012026

Filing Number

66/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

14/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Rejected

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dharmendra Nath Tripathi

    Adv. Vishal Bhardwaj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ram Sagar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The District Judge of Shahjahanpur dismissed Civil Miscellaneous Case No. 14/2026 filed by Dharmendra Nath Tripathi for transfer of the case, primarily on two grounds: (1) the applicant failed to appear despite repeated calls, and (2) the transfer petition became infructuous since the Civil Judge position at Puwayan, which was vacant when the petition was filed, was being filled by a new presiding officer as per High Court orders. The petition was accordingly dismissed as non-maintainable and futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing/Interim Hearing applications/bail

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing/Interim Hearing applications/bail

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Judge of Shahjahanpur dismissed Civil Miscellaneous Case No. 14/2026 filed by Dharmendra Nath Tripathi for transfer of the case, primarily on two grounds: (1) the applicant failed to appear despite repeated calls, and (2) the transfer petition became infructuous since the Civil Judge position at Puwayan, which was vacant when the petition was filed, was being filled by a new presiding officer as per High Court orders. The petition was accordingly dismissed as non-maintainable and futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case