State Government vs SAHIB Advocate - Manoj Kumar Pal — 279/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87,3(5). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 17th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSH010005442026
Filing Number
496/2026
Filing Date
03-Feb-2026
Registration No
279/2026
Registration Date
03-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.1
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 22-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
703
Police Station
SADAR BAZAR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Adv. DGC
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAHIB Advocate - Manoj Kumar Pal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The court rejected the bail petition of the accused under the UP Anti-Conversion Law, 2021. The judge found credible prima facie evidence that the accused coerced a 17-year-old Hindu girl into religious conversion and marriage through threats and inducements, with assistance from his mother and others. The court determined there was no sufficient basis for granting bail given the serious nature of the offense and the established facts of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.1
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing/Interim Hearing applications/bail
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.1
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing/Interim Hearing applications/bail
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.1
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing/Interim Hearing applications/bail
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.1
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing/Interim Hearing applications/bail
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.1
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing/Interim Hearing applications/bail
District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 279/2026
Court Decision Summary The court rejected the bail petition of the accused under the UP Anti-Conversion Law, 2021. The judge found credible prima facie evidence that the accused coerced a 17-year-old Hindu girl into religious conversion and marriage through threats and inducements, with assistance from his mother and others. The court determined there was no sufficient basis for granting bail given the serious nature of the offense and the established facts of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts