State Government vs SAHIB Advocate - Manoj Kumar Pal — 279/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87,3(5). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 17th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPSH010005442026

Case disposed

Filing Number

496/2026

Filing Date

03-02-2026

Registration No

279/2026

Registration Date

03-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.1

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

FIR Details

FIR Number

703

Police Station

SADAR BAZAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87,3(5)
Religious Endowments Act Section 3,5(1)

Petitioner(s)

State Government

Adv. DGC

Respondent(s)

SAHIB Advocate - Manoj Kumar Pal

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.1

17-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Hearing/Interim Hearing applications/bail

11-03-2026

Hearing/Interim Hearing applications/bail

10-03-2026

Hearing/Interim Hearing applications/bail

24-02-2026

Hearing/Interim Hearing applications/bail

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Copy of Order

Court Decision Summary The court rejected the bail petition of the accused under the UP Anti-Conversion Law, 2021. The judge found credible prima facie evidence that the accused coerced a 17-year-old Hindu girl into religious conversion and marriage through threats and inducements, with assistance from his mother and others. The court determined there was no sufficient basis for granting bail given the serious nature of the offense and the established facts of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court rejected the bail petition of the accused under the UP Anti-Conversion Law, 2021. The judge found credible prima facie evidence that the accused coerced a 17-year-old Hindu girl into religious conversion and marriage through threats and inducements, with assistance from his mother and others. The court determined there was no sufficient basis for granting bail given the serious nature of the offense and the established facts of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case