Ayodhya yadav vs State Of UP — 1671/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPSD010038692025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3610/2025

Filing Date

15-12-2025

Registration No

1671/2025

Registration Date

15-12-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

1

Police Station

Khbsharaha

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,504
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)s

Petitioner(s)

Ayodhya yadav

Adv. ALOK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

State Of UP

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

10-03-2026

Disposed

20-02-2026

hearing

13-02-2026

hearing

15-01-2026

hearing

02-01-2026

hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of document.

The Court of Additional Sessions/Special Judge (SC/ST PA Act), Siddharthnagar granted bail to the three accused (Ayodhya Yadav, Pramila, and Meera) in FIR No. 01/2024 under IPC Sections 323, 504 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1). The court found that the accused had no criminal history, no independent witnesses existed against them, and they had not misused their previous interim bail, warranting their release on personal bond of ₹25,000 each with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Additional Sessions/Special Judge (SC/ST PA Act), Siddharthnagar granted bail to the three accused (Ayodhya Yadav, Pramila, and Meera) in FIR No. 01/2024 under IPC Sections 323, 504 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1). The court found that the accused had no criminal history, no independent witnesses existed against them, and they had not misused their previous interim bail, warranting their release on personal bond of ₹25,000 each with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case