Gyanmati vs Raj Kumar — 321/2025

Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge of Siddharthnagar rejected the petitioner Gyanmati's application under Section 173(4) BNSS seeking an FIR against the respondents for alleged assault and eviction attempts on disputed land. The court found that the petitioner has no legal claim to the disputed plot (Gata No. 177), which is reserved for Harijan habitation, and determined the matter is primarily civil in nature involving a land dispute rather than a criminal case. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition as the evidence showed the petitioner possessed no valid lease or occupation rights to the contested property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.