Ghanshyam modanwal vs Shri shankar Bhagawan — 27/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section nil. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.

Civil Revision

CNR: UPSD010020952023

Case disposed

Filing Number

211/2023

Filing Date

29-05-2023

Registration No

27/2023

Registration Date

29-05-2023

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Addl.District Judge/Regular I

Decision Date

08th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section nil

Petitioner(s)

Ghanshyam modanwal

Adv. Bhuvneswar Mani tripathi

Respondent(s)

Shri shankar Bhagawan

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Addl.District Judge/Regular I

08-04-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

hearing

10-03-2026

hearing

21-02-2026

hearing

09-01-2026

hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

08-04-2026
Copy of document.

Summary The Additional District Judge's Civil Revision petition (No. 27/2023) was allowed. The court found that the trial court committed a legal error by disposing of two separate applications (24-G-2 and 7-G-2) with different nature and reliefs together on 27/28.07.2021 without proper analysis. The court set aside the order regarding application 24-G-2 and directed the trial court to rehear it separately and pass a legally sound order based on the analysis regarding the plaintiff's locus standi and representative authority to sue on behalf of a deity/temple. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District Judge's Civil Revision petition (No. 27/2023) was allowed. The court found that the trial court committed a legal error by disposing of two separate applications (24-G-2 and 7-G-2) with different nature and reliefs together on 27/28.07.2021 without proper analysis. The court set aside the order regarding application 24-G-2 and directed the trial court to rehear it separately and pass a legally sound order based on the analysis regarding the plaintiff's locus standi and representative authority to sue on behalf of a deity/temple. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case