Rajesh Nishad vs State Of UP — 344/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 3(1). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th April 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPSD010008522026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

802/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

344/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

17

Police Station

Uska Bazar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 3(1)
UTTAR PRADESH GANGSTERS AND ANTI Section 2(b)(I)

Petitioner(s)

Rajesh Nishad

Adv. GANGA RAM

Respondent(s)

State Of UP

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

07-04-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

hearing

10-03-2026

hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Copy of document.

Summary The Special Court (Gangster Act) in Siddharthnagar rejected the bail application of Rajesh Nishad, accused of being a gang leader involved in selling counterfeit liquor and copyright violations under the UP Gangster Act, 1986. The court found sufficient grounds to deny bail under Section 19(4) of the Act, noting the accused's involvement in serious crimes, prior criminal history across multiple cases, and lack of credible evidence suggesting he would not commit further offenses if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Court (Gangster Act) in Siddharthnagar rejected the bail application of Rajesh Nishad, accused of being a gang leader involved in selling counterfeit liquor and copyright violations under the UP Gangster Act, 1986. The court found sufficient grounds to deny bail under Section 19(4) of the Act, noting the accused's involvement in serious crimes, prior criminal history across multiple cases, and lack of credible evidence suggesting he would not commit further offenses if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case