Rajesh Nishad vs State Of UP — 344/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 3(1). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSD010008522026

Filing Number

802/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

344/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

17

Police Station

Uska Bazar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 3(1)
Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti Section 2(b)(I)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajesh Nishad

    Adv. GANGA RAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    Summary The Special Court (Gangster Act) in Siddharthnagar rejected the bail application of Rajesh Nishad, accused of being a gang leader involved in selling counterfeit liquor and copyright violations under the UP Gangster Act, 1986. The court found sufficient grounds to deny bail under Section 19(4) of the Act, noting the accused's involvement in serious crimes, prior criminal history across multiple cases, and lack of credible evidence suggesting he would not commit further offenses if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    hearing

    Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 344/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Court (Gangster Act) in Siddharthnagar rejected the bail application of Rajesh Nishad, accused of being a gang leader involved in selling counterfeit liquor and copyright violations under the UP Gangster Act, 1986. The court found sufficient grounds to deny bail under Section 19(4) of the Act, noting the accused's involvement in serious crimes, prior criminal history across multiple cases, and lack of credible evidence suggesting he would not commit further offenses if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case