Kanti devi vs State Of UP — 338/2026
Case under Electricity Act Section 138(1)b. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSD010008512026
Filing Number
801/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
338/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Addl.District Judge/Regular I
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
178
Police Station
Anti Power Theft Thana Siddharthnagar
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kanti devi
Adv. AMIT TRIPATHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of UP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of document.View PDF
Summary: The Additional Sessions Court at Siddharthnagar granted bail to Kranti Devi in a case under Section 138(1)B of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant was accused of illegally using electricity by connecting a cable to an LT line without paying outstanding bills despite disconnection. However, considering the facts and circumstances, including that the charge sheet had been filed and the offense carries a maximum sentence of 3 years imprisonment, the court found bail appropriate. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 338/2026
Summary: The Additional Sessions Court at Siddharthnagar granted bail to Kranti Devi in a case under Section 138(1)B of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant was accused of illegally using electricity by connecting a cable to an LT line without paying outstanding bills despite disconnection. However, considering the facts and circumstances, including that the charge sheet had been filed and the offense carries a maximum sentence of 3 years imprisonment, the court found bail appropriate. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts