Kanti devi vs State Of UP — 338/2026

Case under Electricity Act Section 138(1)b. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPSD010008512026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

801/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

338/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Addl.District Judge/Regular I

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

178

Police Station

Anti Power Theft Thana Siddharthnagar

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act Section 138(1)b

Petitioner(s)

Kanti devi

Adv. AMIT TRIPATHI

Respondent(s)

State Of UP

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Addl.District Judge/Regular I

10-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of document.

Summary: The Additional Sessions Court at Siddharthnagar granted bail to Kranti Devi in a case under Section 138(1)B of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant was accused of illegally using electricity by connecting a cable to an LT line without paying outstanding bills despite disconnection. However, considering the facts and circumstances, including that the charge sheet had been filed and the offense carries a maximum sentence of 3 years imprisonment, the court found bail appropriate. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Court at Siddharthnagar granted bail to Kranti Devi in a case under Section 138(1)B of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant was accused of illegally using electricity by connecting a cable to an LT line without paying outstanding bills despite disconnection. However, considering the facts and circumstances, including that the charge sheet had been filed and the offense carries a maximum sentence of 3 years imprisonment, the court found bail appropriate. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case