Mithun vs State Of UP — 351/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(3),110,105. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSD010008492026

Filing Number

799/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

351/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

233

Police Station

Itwa

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(3),110,105

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mithun

    Adv. GOPAL JI TRIPATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    Summary The Sessions Court, Siddharthnagar rejected the bail application of Mithun (accused in FIR No. 233/2025 under BNS sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 110, 105) charged with beating a boy named Panchu, causing serious injuries and ultimately his death on 23.12.2025. The court found sufficient grounds for the serious charge of culpable homicide based on post-mortem findings showing death due to head injuries, and held that bail was not warranted given the grave nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 351/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court, Siddharthnagar rejected the bail application of Mithun (accused in FIR No. 233/2025 under BNS sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 110, 105) charged with beating a boy named Panchu, causing serious injuries and ultimately his death on 23.12.2025. The court found sufficient grounds for the serious charge of culpable homicide based on post-mortem findings showing death due to head injuries, and held that bail was not warranted given the grave nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case