Chandrika vs State Of UP — 339/2026

Case under Electricity Act Section 138B. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSD010008472026

Filing Number

797/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

339/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Addl.District Judge/Regular I

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1041

Police Station

Siddharthnagar

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act Section 138B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandrika

    Adv. YAR MOHAMMAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    Case Summary Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Siddharthnagar granted bail to accused Chandrika in a case under Section 138-B of the Electricity Act (illegal electricity usage). The accused was ordered released on a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety of the same amount. Key Reasoning: Though the accused was charged with illegally drawing electricity from an LT line without payment despite disconnection, the offense carries a maximum punishment of only 3 years imprisonment, the chargesheet had already been filed, and bail was deemed appropriate considering the facts and circumstances of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.District Judge/Regular I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 339/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Siddharthnagar granted bail to accused Chandrika in a case under Section 138-B of the Electricity Act (illegal electricity usage). The accused was ordered released on a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety of the same amount. Key Reasoning: Though the accused was charged with illegally drawing electricity from an LT line without payment despite disconnection, the offense carries a maximum punishment of only 3 years imprisonment, the chargesheet had already been filed, and bail was deemed appropriate considering the facts and circumstances of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case