Chandrika vs State Of UP — 339/2026

Case under Electricity Act Section 138B. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPSD010008472026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

797/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

339/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Addl.District Judge/Regular I

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

1041

Police Station

Siddharthnagar

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act Section 138B

Petitioner(s)

Chandrika

Adv. YAR MOHAMMAD

Respondent(s)

State Of UP

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Addl.District Judge/Regular I

10-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of document.

Case Summary Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Siddharthnagar granted bail to accused Chandrika in a case under Section 138-B of the Electricity Act (illegal electricity usage). The accused was ordered released on a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety of the same amount. Key Reasoning: Though the accused was charged with illegally drawing electricity from an LT line without payment despite disconnection, the offense carries a maximum punishment of only 3 years imprisonment, the chargesheet had already been filed, and bail was deemed appropriate considering the facts and circumstances of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Siddharthnagar granted bail to accused Chandrika in a case under Section 138-B of the Electricity Act (illegal electricity usage). The accused was ordered released on a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety of the same amount. Key Reasoning: Though the accused was charged with illegally drawing electricity from an LT line without payment despite disconnection, the offense carries a maximum punishment of only 3 years imprisonment, the chargesheet had already been filed, and bail was deemed appropriate considering the facts and circumstances of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case