Sangita vs State Of UP — 349/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th April 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSD010008412026
Filing Number
792/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
349/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Addl.District Judge/Regular I
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
86
Police Station
Lotan
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sangita
Adv. DURGESH KUMAR CHAUBEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of UP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
Copy of document.View PDF
The court granted advance bail to Smt. Sangita in a cheating case (IPC Section 420) involving disputed land transactions, finding sufficient grounds based on the Supreme Court's guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil case. She was released on a personal bond of ₹75,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including court appearance, non-tampering with evidence, and remaining available for police questioning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
17-Apr-2026
hearing
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
13-Apr-2026
hearing
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
08-Apr-2026
hearing
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
04-Apr-2026
hearing
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
30-Mar-2026
hearing
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
24-Mar-2026
hearing
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
23-Mar-2026
hearing
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
17-Mar-2026
hearing
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 349/2026
The court granted advance bail to Smt. Sangita in a cheating case (IPC Section 420) involving disputed land transactions, finding sufficient grounds based on the Supreme Court's guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil case. She was released on a personal bond of ₹75,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including court appearance, non-tampering with evidence, and remaining available for police questioning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts