Nitish kumar urf Bhoku vs State Of UP — 316/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87,127(2),137(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSD010006502026

Filing Number

605/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

316/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

15

Police Station

SHIVNAGAR DIDAI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87,127(2),137(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nitish kumar urf Bhoku

    Adv. DEVA NAND SRIVASTAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Nitish Kumar (alias Bhoku) in a case involving kidnapping charges under BNS Sections 137(2), 87, and 127(2). The court found that while the victim's statement described being forcibly taken, she made no allegation of marriage arrangements, immoral acts, or physical assault, and notably stated the co-accused provided her a mobile to contact her mother. Considering the accused's youth, absence of criminal history, and detention since February 20, 2026, the court approved bail on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties and standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    hearing

    Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    hearing

    Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 316/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Nitish Kumar (alias Bhoku) in a case involving kidnapping charges under BNS Sections 137(2), 87, and 127(2). The court found that while the victim's statement described being forcibly taken, she made no allegation of marriage arrangements, immoral acts, or physical assault, and notably stated the co-accused provided her a mobile to contact her mother. Considering the accused's youth, absence of criminal history, and detention since February 20, 2026, the court approved bail on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties and standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case