State Government vs wakila bano — 14/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.
SC ST Act - Special Criminal Case SC ST
CNR: UPSD010005922017
Filing Number
379/2017
Filing Date
17-03-2017
Registration No
14/2017
Registration Date
17-03-2017
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
781
Police Station
Siddharthnagar
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Adv. DGC
Respondent(s)
wakila bano
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Defence Evidence
313 Cr.Pc
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 19-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 10-02-2026 | 313 Cr.Pc |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Special Sessions Court (SC/ST PoA Act), Siddharthnagar acquitted Srimati Keela Bano of charges under IPC Sections 504, 506 and SC/ST (PoA) Act Section 3(1)(10), finding that the prosecution failed to establish that any insult or intimidation was specifically on account of the victim's Scheduled Caste status. The court noted the complainant's death during proceedings and determined the allegations were rooted in a property/family dispute rather than caste-based discrimination, citing Supreme Court precedent requiring clear evidence of caste-based animus for SC/ST Act charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Special Sessions Court (SC/ST PoA Act), Siddharthnagar acquitted Srimati Keela Bano of charges under IPC Sections 504, 506 and SC/ST (PoA) Act Section 3(1)(10), finding that the prosecution failed to establish that any insult or intimidation was specifically on account of the victim's Scheduled Caste status. The court noted the complainant's death during proceedings and determined the allegations were rooted in a property/family dispute rather than caste-based discrimination, citing Supreme Court precedent requiring clear evidence of caste-based animus for SC/ST Act charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts