Sugrim vs State Of UP — 308/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,109(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSD010005732026
Filing Number
531/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
308/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Addl.District Judge/Regular I
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
172
Police Station
Mohana
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sugrim
Adv. MANOJ KUMAR YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of UP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of document.View PDF
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Siddharthagarnagar, rejected the bail application of Sugrim (accused in FIR No. 172/2025 under BNS sections 115(2), 352, 109(1), and 3(5)) filed on 18.03.2026. The court found the charges serious and non-bailable, noting that the accused was named in the FIR for allegedly assaulting the complainant and his companion with a motorcycle, causing a head fracture; the accused also had a prior criminal history, and the investigating officer had filed a charge sheet against him based on evidence collected during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
17-Mar-2026
hearing
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
13-Mar-2026
hearing
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
10-Mar-2026
hearing
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
06-Mar-2026
hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 308/2026
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Siddharthagarnagar, rejected the bail application of Sugrim (accused in FIR No. 172/2025 under BNS sections 115(2), 352, 109(1), and 3(5)) filed on 18.03.2026. The court found the charges serious and non-bailable, noting that the accused was named in the FIR for allegedly assaulting the complainant and his companion with a motorcycle, causing a head fracture; the accused also had a prior criminal history, and the investigating officer had filed a charge sheet against him based on evidence collected during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts