samiurrahman vs State Of UP — 235/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506,427. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSD010004782026

Filing Number

443/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

235/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

73

Police Station

KATHELA SAMAY MATA

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506,427
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)r, 3(1)s, 3(2)5a

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.samiurrahman

    Adv. ROUSHAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Court (SC/ST(PA) Act), Siddharthnagar granted bail to accused Samiul Rahman in FIR No. 73/2024 involving charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 427 and SC/ST Act sections 3(1) and 3(2)(va). The court found that the accused had not misused previous interim bail, had no criminal history, and was from a respectable family with no flight risk, making him suitable for bail on personal bond of ₹25,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    hearing

    Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 235/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court (SC/ST(PA) Act), Siddharthnagar granted bail to accused Samiul Rahman in FIR No. 73/2024 involving charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 427 and SC/ST Act sections 3(1) and 3(2)(va). The court found that the accused had not misused previous interim bail, had no criminal history, and was from a respectable family with no flight risk, making him suitable for bail on personal bond of ₹25,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case