shivnath vs State Of UP — 237/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,115(2),352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSD010004742026

Filing Number

439/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

237/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

17

Police Station

Mishraulia

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,115(2),352
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)r, 3(2)5a

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.shivnath

    Adv. BIRENDRA NATH PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    The Additional Sessions Court (SC/ST PA Act), Siddharthnagar rejected the bail application filed by the appellant without expressing any opinion on merits, as the counsel for the accused did not press the application. The court ordered the rejection of the bail petition in default and directed the case file to be returned to the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    hearing

    Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Restored

    Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    hearing

    Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    hearing

    Addl.District Judge/Special Judge(SC/ST Act)

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 237/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Court (SC/ST PA Act), Siddharthnagar rejected the bail application filed by the appellant without expressing any opinion on merits, as the counsel for the accused did not press the application. The court ordered the rejection of the bail petition in default and directed the case file to be returned to the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case