mohd saaban vs State Of UP — 208/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 419,420,467,468,471. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 30th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSD010004022026
Filing Number
371/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
208/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Addl.District Judge/Regular I
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
7
Police Station
Cyber Crime Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.mohd saaban
Adv. BHANU PRATAP
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of UP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Copy of document.View PDF
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge of Siddharthnagar rejected the anticipatory bail application of Mo. Saaban Akhtar, accused of cyber fraud involving forged documents and unauthorized UPI creation. The court found credible evidence that the accused, a bank employee, created a fraudulent second debit card and UPI ID to embezzle approximately ₹34.5 crores from his father-in-law's ICICI bank account, making the offense serious and grave under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and IT Act section 66C. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
27-Mar-2026
hearing
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
19-Mar-2026
hearing
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
13-Mar-2026
hearing
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
10-Mar-2026
hearing
Addl.District Judge/Regular I
-
26-Feb-2026
hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 208/2026
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge of Siddharthnagar rejected the anticipatory bail application of Mo. Saaban Akhtar, accused of cyber fraud involving forged documents and unauthorized UPI creation. The court found credible evidence that the accused, a bank employee, created a fraudulent second debit card and UPI ID to embezzle approximately ₹34.5 crores from his father-in-law's ICICI bank account, making the offense serious and grave under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and IT Act section 66C. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts