mohd saaban vs State Of UP — 208/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 419,420,467,468,471. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 30th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPSD010004022026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

371/2026

Filing Date

16-02-2026

Registration No

208/2026

Registration Date

16-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Addl.District Judge/Regular I

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

7

Police Station

Cyber Crime Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 419,420,467,468,471
Information Technology Act Section 66C

Petitioner(s)

mohd saaban

Adv. BHANU PRATAP

Respondent(s)

State Of UP

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Addl.District Judge/Regular I

30-03-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

hearing

19-03-2026

hearing

13-03-2026

hearing

10-03-2026

hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Copy of document.

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge of Siddharthnagar rejected the anticipatory bail application of Mo. Saaban Akhtar, accused of cyber fraud involving forged documents and unauthorized UPI creation. The court found credible evidence that the accused, a bank employee, created a fraudulent second debit card and UPI ID to embezzle approximately ₹34.5 crores from his father-in-law's ICICI bank account, making the offense serious and grave under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and IT Act section 66C. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge of Siddharthnagar rejected the anticipatory bail application of Mo. Saaban Akhtar, accused of cyber fraud involving forged documents and unauthorized UPI creation. The court found credible evidence that the accused, a bank employee, created a fraudulent second debit card and UPI ID to embezzle approximately ₹34.5 crores from his father-in-law's ICICI bank account, making the offense serious and grave under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and IT Act section 66C. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case