State vs Rohitash — 2145/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323, 354ख, 504, 506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th April 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: UPRP010094522023

Case disposed

Filing Number

8880/2023

Filing Date

06-12-2023

Registration No

2145/2023

Registration Date

07-12-2023

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Special Judge SC/ ST Act

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

281

Police Station

MILAK

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323, 354ख, 504, 506
Prevention of Atrocities (S.C/S.T Act ) Section 3(1)द, 3(1)ध, 3(2)va

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. ADGC

Respondent(s)

Rohitash

Hardayal

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Special Judge SC/ ST Act

09-04-2026

Disposed

02-04-2026

Judgement

11-03-2026

Arguments

07-03-2026

Evidence

26-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

09-04-2026
Judgement

Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) at Rampur acquitted defendants Rohitash and Haryal of charges under IPC Sections 323, 354-B, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act Sections 3(1)/3(2), finding the prosecution failed to prove allegations beyond reasonable doubt. While the victim testified about the incident, other prosecution witnesses contradicted the prosecution's case, and medical evidence only confirmed injuries without clarifying circumstances. The court granted the defendants the benefit of doubt and ordered their release on bail with bonds of Rs. 25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) at Rampur acquitted defendants Rohitash and Haryal of charges under IPC Sections 323, 354-B, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act Sections 3(1)/3(2), finding the prosecution failed to prove allegations beyond reasonable doubt. While the victim testified about the incident, other prosecution witnesses contradicted the prosecution's case, and medical evidence only confirmed injuries without clarifying circumstances. The court granted the defendants the benefit of doubt and ordered their release on bail with bonds of Rs. 25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case