Mohammad Arif vs State of UP — 104/2025
Case under Domestic Violence Section 29. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 01st April 2026.
CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: UPRP010090252025
Filing Number
8613/2025
Filing Date
03-Dec-2025
Registration No
104/2025
Registration Date
03-Dec-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-Adj II
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 22-May-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
MILAK KHANAM
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mohammad Arif
Adv. Sri Irfan Ali
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of UP
-
2.Hasroom jaha
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Rampur dismissed a criminal appeal filed by Mohammad Arif under the Domestic Violence Act. The court found that the lower court's order dated 06.11.2025 directing Arif to pay education expenses (₹3,26,000) for the complainant's children and provide housing was legally valid and based on proper evidence. The appellate court rejected arguments about res judicata, holding that the doctrine applies to this matter and prevents re-litigation of issues already finally decided on 29.11.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Adj II
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Adj II
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Adj II
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Adj II
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Adj II
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
Adj II
-
11-Feb-2026
Hearing
Adj II
-
29-Jan-2026
Hearing
Adj II
-
19-Jan-2026
Hearing
Adj II
-
23-Dec-2025
Hearing
Adj II
-
03-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 104/2025
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Rampur dismissed a criminal appeal filed by Mohammad Arif under the Domestic Violence Act. The court found that the lower court's order dated 06.11.2025 directing Arif to pay education expenses (₹3,26,000) for the complainant's children and provide housing was legally valid and based on proper evidence. The appellate court rejected arguments about res judicata, holding that the doctrine applies to this matter and prevents re-litigation of issues already finally decided on 29.11.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts