Hashrat Ali vs State of UP — 348/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305A. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPRP010016452026

Filing Number

1585/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

348/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-Adj II

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

53

Police Station

SWAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hashrat Ali

    Adv. Sri Krishna Pal Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case 348/2026 Summary: The Additional Sessions Court, Rampur granted bail to Hashrat Ali, accused of theft under BNS Sections 331(4) and 305, after he was arrested on 19.02.2026 for allegedly stealing a water motor from a tubewell. The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite the serious nature of charges, noting the absence of prior conviction proof, delayed FIR registration, lack of independent witnesses, and no recovery of stolen property. Ali was released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with conditions including mandatory court appearances and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Adj II

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Adj II

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Adj II

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 348/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 348/2026 Summary: The Additional Sessions Court, Rampur granted bail to Hashrat Ali, accused of theft under BNS Sections 331(4) and 305, after he was arrested on 19.02.2026 for allegedly stealing a water motor from a tubewell. The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite the serious nature of charges, noting the absence of prior conviction proof, delayed FIR registration, lack of independent witnesses, and no recovery of stolen property. Ali was released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with conditions including mandatory court appearances and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case