State vs Ajay Kumar — 610/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 272. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED AND FINED on 21st May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: UPRP010015952023
Filing Number
1505/2023
Filing Date
20-02-2023
Registration No
610/2023
Registration Date
20-02-2023
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-Adj II
Decision Date
21st May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED AND FINED
FIR Details
FIR Number
211
Police Station
TANDA
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. ADGC
Respondent(s)
Ajay Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Adj II
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-05-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 30-04-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 15-04-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 01-04-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Ajay Kumar (610/2023) The court convicted Ajay Kumar under Section 60(1) of the Excise Act for possessing 25 liters of illicit liquor mixed with urea, which police recovered on April 25, 2022, near Davadyal in Rampur district. However, the court acquitted him under IPC Section 272 (adulteration), finding insufficient evidence that the alcohol was being sold to others. The defendant's voluntary confession and time already served in custody were considered mitigating factors. Sentence: Imprisonment already undergone plus ₹500 fine (3 days additional imprisonment if fine unpaid). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Ajay Kumar (610/2023) The court convicted Ajay Kumar under Section 60(1) of the Excise Act for possessing 25 liters of illicit liquor mixed with urea, which police recovered on April 25, 2022, near Davadyal in Rampur district. However, the court acquitted him under IPC Section 272 (adulteration), finding insufficient evidence that the alcohol was being sold to others. The defendant's voluntary confession and time already served in custody were considered mitigating factors. Sentence: Imprisonment already undergone plus ₹500 fine (3 days additional imprisonment if fine unpaid). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts