Ranjit Yadav vs State of UP — 318/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 117(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPRP010014442026

Filing Number

1395/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

318/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 117(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ranjit Yadav

    Adv. Sri Ashok Kumar Singh Yadav

  2. 2.Kamal Singh

  3. 3.Rajveer

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Court, Rampur granted bail to three accused (Ranjit Yadav, Kamal Singh, and Rajveer) in a criminal case involving charges under BNS sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109, and 117(2). The court found that since the accused had already obtained bail from the High Court for the more serious charges, and the newly added section 117(2) charge (bailable and less severe) warranted bail, they were released on personal bond of ₹25,000 each with two sureties of equivalent amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 318/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court, Rampur granted bail to three accused (Ranjit Yadav, Kamal Singh, and Rajveer) in a criminal case involving charges under BNS sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109, and 117(2). The court found that since the accused had already obtained bail from the High Court for the more serious charges, and the newly added section 117(2) charge (bailable and less severe) warranted bail, they were released on personal bond of ₹25,000 each with two sureties of equivalent amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case