Talib vs State of UP — 322/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 69. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPRP010014432026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1394/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

322/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 69

Petitioner(s)

Talib

Adv. Mohd. Usman Khan

Respondent(s)

State of UP

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District & Session Judge

12-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Hearing

06-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of document.

Summary The Sessions Court of Rampur granted bail to the accused Talib (charged under Section 69 BNS) after finding significant inconsistencies in the prosecution's case. The court noted that the FIR lacked specific dates, times, and locations of the alleged offenses, the victim's statements contained contradictions regarding five years of alleged sexual abuse with only 3-4 instances mentioned, and there was no credible evidence of deception or false promises of marriage. The court accepted the bail petition, ordering the accused to furnish a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court of Rampur granted bail to the accused Talib (charged under Section 69 BNS) after finding significant inconsistencies in the prosecution's case. The court noted that the FIR lacked specific dates, times, and locations of the alleged offenses, the victim's statements contained contradictions regarding five years of alleged sexual abuse with only 3-4 instances mentioned, and there was no credible evidence of deception or false promises of marriage. The court accepted the bail petition, ordering the accused to furnish a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case