Harswaroop vs State of UP — 313/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 76,115(2),126(2),351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPRP010010452026

Filing Number

999/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

313/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

140

Police Station

AZIM NAGAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 76,115(2),126(2),351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Harswaroop

    Adv. D.K.Nanda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    Summary The Sessions Court at Rampur granted bail to the accused Harswarup in a First Bail Application (No. 171/2026) under BNS sections 76, 115(2), 126(2), and 351(2). The court found insufficient evidence during investigation to support the charges of assault and outraging modesty; no medical report corroborated the prosecution's narrative, and contradictions existed in the victim's statement under BNS sections 180 and 183. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 313/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court at Rampur granted bail to the accused Harswarup in a First Bail Application (No. 171/2026) under BNS sections 76, 115(2), 126(2), and 351(2). The court found insufficient evidence during investigation to support the charges of assault and outraging modesty; no medical report corroborated the prosecution's narrative, and contradictions existed in the victim's statement under BNS sections 180 and 183. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case