Pavan urf Ambe vs State of UP — 222/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 3(5),109(1). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPRP010004562026

Case disposed

Filing Number

427/2026

Filing Date

11-02-2026

Registration No

222/2026

Registration Date

11-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

10

Police Station

PATWAI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 3(5),109(1)
U.P. EXCISE ACT, 1910 Section 60(1),72

Petitioner(s)

Pavan urf Ambe

Adv. Sri Ajeet Singh

Respondent(s)

State of UP

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADJ I

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Hearing

25-02-2026

Hearing

20-02-2026

Hearing

18-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Rampur granted bail to applicant Pawan (alias Ambe) in a case involving illegal liquor smuggling, theft, and firing at police. Although the applicant faced serious charges under BNS sections 3(5), 109(1) and the Excise Act for allegedly participating in liquor thefts and armed confrontation with police, the court found sufficient grounds for bail, considering that no police officer was injured, the applicant was not arrested at the crime scene, co-accused had already been granted bail, and there were no independent witnesses. The court released him on personal bond of ₹75,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with prosecution evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Rampur granted bail to applicant Pawan (alias Ambe) in a case involving illegal liquor smuggling, theft, and firing at police. Although the applicant faced serious charges under BNS sections 3(5), 109(1) and the Excise Act for allegedly participating in liquor thefts and armed confrontation with police, the court found sufficient grounds for bail, considering that no police officer was injured, the applicant was not arrested at the crime scene, co-accused had already been granted bail, and there were no independent witnesses. The court released him on personal bond of ₹75,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with prosecution evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case