Pavan urf Ambe vs State of UP — 222/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 3(5),109(1). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPRP010004562026
Filing Number
427/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
222/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-ADJ I
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
10
Police Station
PATWAI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pavan urf Ambe
Adv. Sri Ajeet Singh
Respondent(s)
State of UP
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADJ I
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 25-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 20-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 18-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Rampur granted bail to applicant Pawan (alias Ambe) in a case involving illegal liquor smuggling, theft, and firing at police. Although the applicant faced serious charges under BNS sections 3(5), 109(1) and the Excise Act for allegedly participating in liquor thefts and armed confrontation with police, the court found sufficient grounds for bail, considering that no police officer was injured, the applicant was not arrested at the crime scene, co-accused had already been granted bail, and there were no independent witnesses. The court released him on personal bond of ₹75,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with prosecution evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Rampur granted bail to applicant Pawan (alias Ambe) in a case involving illegal liquor smuggling, theft, and firing at police. Although the applicant faced serious charges under BNS sections 3(5), 109(1) and the Excise Act for allegedly participating in liquor thefts and armed confrontation with police, the court found sufficient grounds for bail, considering that no police officer was injured, the applicant was not arrested at the crime scene, co-accused had already been granted bail, and there were no independent witnesses. The court released him on personal bond of ₹75,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with prosecution evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts