SMT. RADHA URF RAM DULARI vs PRADEEP KUMAR AND OTHERS — 385/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,504,506. Status: Statement 200. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
COMPLAINT CASES
CNR: UPRN120013612019
Filing Number
385/2019
Filing Date
04-Sep-2019
Registration No
385/2019
Registration Date
04-Sep-2019
Court
Civil Judge Juniour Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
Judge
1-Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
Last updated 07-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. RADHA URF RAM DULARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRADEEP KUMAR AND OTHERS
Case History
-
07-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Mar-2026
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
08-Jan-2026
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
30-Oct-2025
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
19-Aug-2025
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
03-Jun-2025
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
07-Apr-2025
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
07-Jan-2025
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
10-Dec-2024
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
18-Oct-2024
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
22-Aug-2024
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
05-Jun-2024
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
17-Feb-2024
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
22-Dec-2023
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
29-Nov-2023
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
18-Oct-2023
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
18-Sep-2023
Copy of Judicial Order.View PDF
Summary: The court dismissed the petition against accused Pradeep Kumar, Susheelam, and Srimati Chanda Devi under IPC Section 498A and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that the accused family members were merely casually named in a matrimonial dispute without specific allegations of active involvement, and following the Supreme Court precedent in Geeta Mehrotra v State of UP, held that such casual references do not justify cognizance. The case was adjourned to October 18, 2023, for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Sep-2023
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
24-Aug-2023
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
24-Jul-2023
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
09-Jun-2023
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
01-May-2023
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
11-Apr-2023
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
10-Mar-2023
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
01-Feb-2023
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
17-Jan-2023
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
06-Dec-2022
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
08-Oct-2022
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
16-Aug-2022
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
04-Jul-2022
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
19-May-2022
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
08-Apr-2022
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
08-Feb-2022
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
06-Jan-2022
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
24-Nov-2021
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
21-Oct-2021
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
04-Oct-2021
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
09-Aug-2021
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
29-Jun-2021
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
20-May-2021
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
12-Apr-2021
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
22-Mar-2021
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
05-Mar-2021
Statement 200
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
19-Feb-2021
Hearing
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
30-Jan-2021
Hearing
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
16-Jan-2021
Hearing
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
11-Nov-2020
Hearing
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
14-Sep-2020
Hearing
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
20-Jul-2020
Hearing
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
29-May-2020
Hearing
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
07-Apr-2020
Hearing
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
01-Feb-2020
Hearing
Civil Judge Junior Division Bhognipur Kanpur Dehat
-
22-Jan-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Sep-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 385/2019
Summary: The court dismissed the petition against accused Pradeep Kumar, Susheelam, and Srimati Chanda Devi under IPC Section 498A and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that the accused family members were merely casually named in a matrimonial dispute without specific allegations of active involvement, and following the Supreme Court precedent in Geeta Mehrotra v State of UP, held that such casual references do not justify cognizance. The case was adjourned to October 18, 2023, for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts