PATRAKHAN vs RAM SHANKAR AND OTHERS — 855/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
Criminal Misc. Cases
CNR: UPRN010072192025
Filing Number
6831/2025
Filing Date
19-Dec-2025
Registration No
855/2025
Registration Date
24-Dec-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-IInd Additional District and Sessions Judge / Spl. Judge(S.C./S.t.)
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
AKBARPUR
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PATRAKHAN
Adv. SAROJ DIXIT
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAM SHANKAR AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court accepted the petitioner's application under Section 173(4) BNSS and directed that it be registered as a First Information Report (FIR) for investigation. The court found sufficient grounds based on the petitioner's detailed knowledge of the accused persons, their names, addresses, and complete details of the alleged incident, which he can substantiate through oral evidence. Applying precedents from the High Court of Allahabad and Supreme Court, the court deemed it appropriate to convert the petition into an FIR and ordered notices to the accused parties under Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for their statement recording. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
IInd Additional District and Sessions Judge / Spl. Judge(S.C./S.t.)
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
IInd Additional District and Sessions Judge / Spl. Judge(S.C./S.t.)
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
IInd Additional District and Sessions Judge / Spl. Judge(S.C./S.t.)
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
IInd Additional District and Sessions Judge / Spl. Judge(S.C./S.t.)
-
09-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 855/2025
The court accepted the petitioner's application under Section 173(4) BNSS and directed that it be registered as a First Information Report (FIR) for investigation. The court found sufficient grounds based on the petitioner's detailed knowledge of the accused persons, their names, addresses, and complete details of the alleged incident, which he can substantiate through oral evidence. Applying precedents from the High Court of Allahabad and Supreme Court, the court deemed it appropriate to convert the petition into an FIR and ordered notices to the accused parties under Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for their statement recording. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts