STATE vs AJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS Advocate - RAJA RAM KATIYAR — 2094/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,504. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: UPRN010071652023
Filing Number
6759/2023
Filing Date
19-Sep-2023
Registration No
2094/2023
Registration Date
06-Oct-2023
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
70
Police Station
SIKANDARA
Year
1996
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Adv. ADGC
Respondent(s)
-
1.AJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS Advocate - RAJA RAM KATIYAR
-
2.SUBHASH CHANDRA @ KALLU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Judgement's CopyView PDF
Summary The court acquitted defendants Ajay Kumar and Subhash alias Kullu of charges under IPC Sections 307 (attempt to murder) and 504 (intentional insult), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the prosecution's witness testimony was insufficient and contradictory, and critical evidence such as medical examination reports and eyewitness accounts to the alleged bomb attack were missing from the case file, making it impossible to establish the defendants' guilt with the required legal certainty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
04-Apr-2026
Judgement
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
20-Feb-2026
Arguments
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
05-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
29-Jan-2026
Statement U/S 313
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
30-Sep-2025
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
01-Sep-2025
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
26-Jun-2025
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
26-May-2025
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
29-Mar-2025
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
01-Mar-2025
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
29-Jan-2025
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
19-Dec-2024
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
19-Nov-2024
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
19-Oct-2024
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
19-Sep-2024
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
21-Aug-2024
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
18-Jul-2024
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
19-Jun-2024
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
21-May-2024
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
22-Apr-2024
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
18-Mar-2024
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
26-Feb-2024
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
20-Jan-2024
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
14-Dec-2023
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
09-Nov-2023
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
09-Oct-2023
Evidence
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
06-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 2094/2023
Summary The court acquitted defendants Ajay Kumar and Subhash alias Kullu of charges under IPC Sections 307 (attempt to murder) and 504 (intentional insult), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the prosecution's witness testimony was insufficient and contradictory, and critical evidence such as medical examination reports and eyewitness accounts to the alleged bomb attack were missing from the case file, making it impossible to establish the defendants' guilt with the required legal certainty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts