RAMBABU AND OTHERS vs STATE — 519/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),85. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPRN010013152026

Filing Number

1259/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

519/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

RANIA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),85
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMBABU AND OTHERS

    Adv. MAHENDRA MOHAN SRIVASTAVA

  2. 2.mohan devi alias mohan dei

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of Rambabu and Mohan Devi, accused of dowry death under BNS sections 80(2), 85 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that credible allegations exist that the accused demanded a motorcycle as additional dowry and harassed the deceased, whose death (by hanging) occurred within four years of marriage, and concluded the offense is serious in nature with investigation still pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    For Disposal

    District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 519/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of Rambabu and Mohan Devi, accused of dowry death under BNS sections 80(2), 85 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that credible allegations exist that the accused demanded a motorcycle as additional dowry and harassed the deceased, whose death (by hanging) occurred within four years of marriage, and concluded the offense is serious in nature with investigation still pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case