SEEPU vs STATE — 521/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,109(1),115(2),351(3),326(g). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPRN010012952026

Filing Number

1240/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

521/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

14-Additional District and Sessions Judge (F.T.C.)(Crime against Women)

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

15

Police Station

SAJETI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,109(1),115(2),351(3),326(g)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SEEPU

    Adv. RAGHUNANDAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the bail petition of accused Sipu (age 22) charged under sections 74, 109(1), 115(2), 351(3), and 326(g) of the BNS for allegedly molesting a girl, assaulting her family members with weapons (axes and sticks), causing serious injuries, and setting fire to their house. The court found credible evidence including the victim's statements under sections 180 and 183 BNSS, medical reports confirming injuries, and the severity of offenses against a minority Muslim family, determining that bail was unjustified and no grounds existed for release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge (F.T.C.)(Crime against Women)

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    For Disposal

    Additional District and Sessions Judge (F.T.C.)(Crime against Women)

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 521/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail petition of accused Sipu (age 22) charged under sections 74, 109(1), 115(2), 351(3), and 326(g) of the BNS for allegedly molesting a girl, assaulting her family members with weapons (axes and sticks), causing serious injuries, and setting fire to their house. The court found credible evidence including the victim's statements under sections 180 and 183 BNSS, medical reports confirming injuries, and the severity of offenses against a minority Muslim family, determining that bail was unjustified and no grounds existed for release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case