SUDHIR vs STATE — 426/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 221,223,324(3),224,126(2),125,121,132,191(2),192. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPRN010009102026

Filing Number

869/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

426/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

5-VIIth Additional District and Sessions Judge Kanpur Dehat

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

169

Police Station

SIKANDARA

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 221,223,324(3),224,126(2),125,121,132,191(2),192
Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act Section 3
Criminal Law (Amendment) Act Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUDHIR

    Adv. Advocate

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Additional District and Sessions Court, Kanpur Dehat granted advance bail (interim bail) to applicant Sudhir (Case No. 169/2024) charged with multiple serious offenses including rioting, criminal intimidation, and damaging public property under BNS/IPC sections. The court found the applicant's case suitable for bail based on the procedural examination and fact that no arrest warrant had been executed during investigation, while imposing conditions including a personal bond of ₹50,000, cooperation in trial, and prohibition from tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    VIIth Additional District and Sessions Judge Kanpur Dehat

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    For Disposal

    VIIth Additional District and Sessions Judge Kanpur Dehat

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 426/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional District and Sessions Court, Kanpur Dehat granted advance bail (interim bail) to applicant Sudhir (Case No. 169/2024) charged with multiple serious offenses including rioting, criminal intimidation, and damaging public property under BNS/IPC sections. The court found the applicant's case suitable for bail based on the procedural examination and fact that no arrest warrant had been executed during investigation, while imposing conditions including a personal bond of ₹50,000, cooperation in trial, and prohibition from tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case