SUDHIR vs STATE — 426/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 221,223,324(3),224,126(2),125,121,132,191(2),192. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPRN010009102026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
869/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
426/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-VIIth Additional District and Sessions Judge Kanpur Dehat
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
169
Police Station
SIKANDARA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUDHIR
Adv. Advocate
Respondent(s)
STATE
Hearing History
Judge: 5-VIIth Additional District and Sessions Judge Kanpur Dehat
Disposed
For Disposal
For Disposal
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 28-02-2026 | For Disposal | |
| 25-02-2026 | For Disposal |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional District and Sessions Court, Kanpur Dehat granted advance bail (interim bail) to applicant Sudhir (Case No. 169/2024) charged with multiple serious offenses including rioting, criminal intimidation, and damaging public property under BNS/IPC sections. The court found the applicant's case suitable for bail based on the procedural examination and fact that no arrest warrant had been executed during investigation, while imposing conditions including a personal bond of ₹50,000, cooperation in trial, and prohibition from tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional District and Sessions Court, Kanpur Dehat granted advance bail (interim bail) to applicant Sudhir (Case No. 169/2024) charged with multiple serious offenses including rioting, criminal intimidation, and damaging public property under BNS/IPC sections. The court found the applicant's case suitable for bail based on the procedural examination and fact that no arrest warrant had been executed during investigation, while imposing conditions including a personal bond of ₹50,000, cooperation in trial, and prohibition from tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts