CHETRAM ALIAS SAHABLAL AND OTHER vs STATE — 394/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,80(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPRN010007992026
Filing Number
761/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
394/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
200
Police Station
RANIA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHETRAM ALIAS SAHABLAL AND OTHER
Adv. Advocate
-
2.sarojani
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Session Court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Chetaram alias Sahabalal and Smt. Sarojni in a dowry death case (IPC Sections 85, 80(2)B, and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act). The court found prima facie evidence that the accused demanded dowry from their daughter-in-law Sangita; when it was not provided, they tortured her, resulting in her death by hanging within six months of marriage. The postmortem confirmed injury marks on her body, and witness statements corroborated the allegations, making the charges grave in nature and unsuitable for anticipatory bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
17-Mar-2026
For Disposal
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
09-Mar-2026
For Disposal
District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 394/2026
Court Decision Summary The Session Court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Chetaram alias Sahabalal and Smt. Sarojni in a dowry death case (IPC Sections 85, 80(2)B, and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act). The court found prima facie evidence that the accused demanded dowry from their daughter-in-law Sangita; when it was not provided, they tortured her, resulting in her death by hanging within six months of marriage. The postmortem confirmed injury marks on her body, and witness statements corroborated the allegations, making the charges grave in nature and unsuitable for anticipatory bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts