CHETRAM ALIAS SAHABLAL AND OTHER vs STATE — 394/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,80(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPRN010007992026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
761/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
394/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
200
Police Station
RANIA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHETRAM ALIAS SAHABLAL AND OTHER
Adv. Advocate
sarojani
Respondent(s)
STATE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Session Judge Kanpur Dehat
Disposed
For Disposal
For Disposal
For Disposal
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | For Disposal | |
| 09-03-2026 | For Disposal | |
| 24-02-2026 | For Disposal |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Session Court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Chetaram alias Sahabalal and Smt. Sarojni in a dowry death case (IPC Sections 85, 80(2)B, and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act). The court found prima facie evidence that the accused demanded dowry from their daughter-in-law Sangita; when it was not provided, they tortured her, resulting in her death by hanging within six months of marriage. The postmortem confirmed injury marks on her body, and witness statements corroborated the allegations, making the charges grave in nature and unsuitable for anticipatory bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Session Court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Chetaram alias Sahabalal and Smt. Sarojni in a dowry death case (IPC Sections 85, 80(2)B, and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act). The court found prima facie evidence that the accused demanded dowry from their daughter-in-law Sangita; when it was not provided, they tortured her, resulting in her death by hanging within six months of marriage. The postmortem confirmed injury marks on her body, and witness statements corroborated the allegations, making the charges grave in nature and unsuitable for anticipatory bail release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts