BABLU AWASTHI ALIAS RAJESH AND OTHERS vs STATE — 151/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPRN010002372026
Filing Number
226/2026
Filing Date
16-Jan-2026
Registration No
151/2026
Registration Date
16-Jan-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-IInd Additional District and Sessions Judge / Spl. Judge(S.C./S.t.)
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
357
Police Station
SHIVLI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BABLU AWASTHI ALIAS RAJESH AND OTHERS
Adv. CHANDRA PRAKASH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court granted bail to the two accused, Bablu Awasthi and Avnesh Prajapati, charged under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(va) for allegedly assaulting and using caste slurs against the complainant's son. The court found that the accused had no criminal history, were not previously granted interim bail that was misused, and the offenses carried sentences under seven years, meeting bail criteria under Supreme Court precedent in Satendra Kumar Antil v. CBI. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
IInd Additional District and Sessions Judge / Spl. Judge(S.C./S.t.)
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
IInd Additional District and Sessions Judge / Spl. Judge(S.C./S.t.)
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
IInd Additional District and Sessions Judge / Spl. Judge(S.C./S.t.)
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
IInd Additional District and Sessions Judge / Spl. Judge(S.C./S.t.)
-
31-Jan-2026
Hearing
IInd Additional District and Sessions Judge / Spl. Judge(S.C./S.t.)
-
16-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 151/2026
The court granted bail to the two accused, Bablu Awasthi and Avnesh Prajapati, charged under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(va) for allegedly assaulting and using caste slurs against the complainant's son. The court found that the accused had no criminal history, were not previously granted interim bail that was misused, and the offenses carried sentences under seven years, meeting bail criteria under Supreme Court precedent in Satendra Kumar Antil v. CBI. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts