SAUMYA SINGH vs State Government — 177/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED ON MERARITS on 17th April 2026.
Criminal Revision
CNR: UPRB010032532025
Filing Number
3098/2025
Filing Date
28-May-2025
Registration No
177/2025
Registration Date
28-May-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-Spl. Judge(E.C. Act)
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED ON MERARITS
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAUMYA SINGH
Adv. MATA PRASAD SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Government
-
2.MANEESH KUMAR TRIPATHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The court upheld the lower court's order converting the petitioner's application under Section 173(4) BNS into a criminal complaint rather than directing a police investigation. The court found the petitioner had personal knowledge of all facts, possessed witnesses to prove the allegations regarding non-payment of ₹1 lakh in a property sale transaction, and that no investigation was necessary since no new facts required police inquiry. Consequently, the criminal revision petition was dismissed and the original order dated 01.05.2025 was confirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
Spl. Judge(E.C. Act)
-
08-Apr-2026
Judgement
Spl. Judge(E.C. Act)
-
01-Apr-2026
Judgement
Spl. Judge(E.C. Act)
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Spl. Judge(E.C. Act)
-
03-Feb-2026
Hearing
Spl. Judge(E.C. Act)
-
08-Jan-2026
Hearing
Spl. Judge(E.C. Act)
-
01-Dec-2025
Hearing
District and Session Judge
-
31-Oct-2025
Hearing
District and Session Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Hearing
District and Session Judge
-
21-Aug-2025
Hearing
District and Session Judge
-
29-Jul-2025
Hearing
District and Session Judge
-
07-Jul-2025
Hearing
District and Session Judge
-
28-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 177/2025
The court upheld the lower court's order converting the petitioner's application under Section 173(4) BNS into a criminal complaint rather than directing a police investigation. The court found the petitioner had personal knowledge of all facts, possessed witnesses to prove the allegations regarding non-payment of ₹1 lakh in a property sale transaction, and that no investigation was necessary since no new facts required police inquiry. Consequently, the criminal revision petition was dismissed and the original order dated 01.05.2025 was confirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts