DEEPU VALMEEK URF KALA vs State Government — 671/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),317(2),61(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th April 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPRB010016462026
Filing Number
1542/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
671/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-I Addl District and Session Judge
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
42
Police Station
UNCHAHAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEEPU VALMEEK URF KALA
Adv. SHASHIKANT SRIVASTAVA
-
2.ASHWANI IRF SANI
-
3.ADHARSH PASI URF NUNNU PASI
-
4.AMIT RAWAT URF AMIT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Government
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The court granted bail to four accused persons (Deepu Balmik, Ashwani, Adarsh Pasi, and Amit Rawat) charged under BNS sections 309(4), 317(2), and 61(2) in a robbery case. The court found that while the accused were allegedly arrested with stolen items (laptop, mobile, wallet), there was no independent witness to the arrest and recovery, the accused were not named in the FIR, and identification parade was not conducted—factors sufficient to warrant bail on personal bond of ₹25,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
I Addl District and Session Judge
-
17-Apr-2026
Hearing
I Addl District and Session Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing
I Addl District and Session Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing
I Addl District and Session Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
I Addl District and Session Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Session Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 671/2026
Summary The court granted bail to four accused persons (Deepu Balmik, Ashwani, Adarsh Pasi, and Amit Rawat) charged under BNS sections 309(4), 317(2), and 61(2) in a robbery case. The court found that while the accused were allegedly arrested with stolen items (laptop, mobile, wallet), there was no independent witness to the arrest and recovery, the accused were not named in the FIR, and identification parade was not conducted—factors sufficient to warrant bail on personal bond of ₹25,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts