ADITYA PATEL URF CHUMBHI vs State Government — 669/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPRB010016442026
Filing Number
1540/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
669/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Session Judge
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
35
Police Station
DEEH
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ADITYA PATEL URF CHUMBHI
Adv. SUKH RAJ
Respondent(s)
State Government
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Session Judge
Disposed
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Court at Raebareli granted bail to Aditya Patel (alias Chumbhi), a 20-year-old accused of motorcycle theft under sections 303(2), 317(2), and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code 2023. The court found insufficient independent corroborating evidence for the alleged recovery and arrest, noting the absence of eyewitnesses to the seizure, and accepted that the accused had already been imprisoned since March 5, 2026. Bail was granted on condition of personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sessions Court at Raebareli granted bail to Aditya Patel (alias Chumbhi), a 20-year-old accused of motorcycle theft under sections 303(2), 317(2), and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code 2023. The court found insufficient independent corroborating evidence for the alleged recovery and arrest, noting the absence of eyewitnesses to the seizure, and accepted that the accused had already been imprisoned since March 5, 2026. Bail was granted on condition of personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts