ADITYA PATEL URF CHUMBHI vs State Government — 669/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPRB010016442026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1540/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

669/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Session Judge

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

35

Police Station

DEEH

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

ADITYA PATEL URF CHUMBHI

Adv. SUKH RAJ

Respondent(s)

State Government

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Session Judge

17-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Sessions Court at Raebareli granted bail to Aditya Patel (alias Chumbhi), a 20-year-old accused of motorcycle theft under sections 303(2), 317(2), and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code 2023. The court found insufficient independent corroborating evidence for the alleged recovery and arrest, noting the absence of eyewitnesses to the seizure, and accepted that the accused had already been imprisoned since March 5, 2026. Bail was granted on condition of personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court at Raebareli granted bail to Aditya Patel (alias Chumbhi), a 20-year-old accused of motorcycle theft under sections 303(2), 317(2), and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code 2023. The court found insufficient independent corroborating evidence for the alleged recovery and arrest, noting the absence of eyewitnesses to the seizure, and accepted that the accused had already been imprisoned since March 5, 2026. Bail was granted on condition of personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties and strict conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case